State will kill two wolves linked to dead livestock

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

The Imnaha wolf pack alpha male is one of two wolves sentenced to die after another confirmed wolf attack on livestock in northeast Oregon.

This news, sent in a press release at 6 p.m. Friday, caught me off-guard.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife investigated another livestock depredation in Northeast Oregon on Thursday.

The dead calf showed the telltale signs of a wolf attack, and a tracking collar shows the alpha male of the Imnaha pack was at the scene last week. ODFW confirmed the wolf attack and on Friday announced plans to kill two Imnaha wolves – including the alpha male, seen in the photo to the left.

Another uncollared wolf in the pack will also be targeted, ODFW reports. Killing two wolves will mean there are only two wolves left in the Imnaha pack (see photo below): The alpha female and a pup born this spring.

“Today’s decision was not made lightly,” said ODFW Director Roy Elicker. “We’re working hard to conserve wolves in Oregon, yet be sensitive to the losses suffered by livestock owners.”

Rob Klavins, a wolf advocate with Oregon Wild, said he’s disappointed the state is still moving to kill wolves so quickly now that there is a compensation program to reimburse ranchers for livestock killed by wolves.

“Oregonians will now be footing the bill for both Todd Nash’s cow and the killing of most of what remains of Oregon’s first wolf pack leaving behind a single pup and the alpha female to fend for themselves,” Klavins said in an e-mailed response.

ODFW

From left, the Imnaha pack alpha female (white-gray), a sub-adult wolf, alpha male (black) and a 2011 pup (black). This shot was taken by a trail camera in Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, in Wallowa County on July 9.

In the past 18 months, state and federal agencies have confirmed 14 livestock losses to the Imnaha pack. ODFW or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed seven losses this year (two in February, and on April 30, May 4 and 17, June 5, and Sept. 22) and seven last year.

And officials are noticing a pattern in the wolf attacks. In both 2010 and 2011, wolves killed livestock April through early June and then again in September. Two other livestock losses this year, including one on Sept. 7, were determined to be “probable” kills by Imnaha wolves.

ODFW already killed two wolves from the Imnaha pack earlier this year, after four confirmed livestock losses this spring 2011. The state’s wolf management plan allows ODFW to kill wolves after “chronic” livestock depredation.

Thursday’s investigation revealed that a large spring calf had been dead less than two days, but it was almost completely consumed, which suggests the entire pack had fed on it. ODFW reported Friday that the depredation happened in the same area near Joseph where wolf kills were confirmed in May and June, even though landowners have been using non-lethal measures to deter wolf-livestock interactions.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1023315424 Dave Miller

    So we’re killing all but two of the remaining native species in order to protect 0.00…1% of the non-native species… hmm.

    Is there any money in “wolf tourism”?  Seems like that might be a better perspective to take.   I don’t know the cost of 14 calves, but I bet it is minuscule in comparison to what people would pay to have some kind of wild wolf experience.

    Putting a pack of wolves up against flossie the cow is never going to be a fair contest.  If wolves lived there before European settlement, what did they eat?  Can we replace flossie with those?

    • prohuman

      The wolf tourist lie has been exposed in every single State that wolves are in. Hunters and ranchers are the ones that support local rural community the tiny fringe group in the wolf cult don’t have the money to even travel there let alone support the community. As one hotel owner told me I have NEVER rented a room to a wolf lover but I sure do miss all the hunters that use to come here. Why were the hunters no longer coming cause the wolves wipe out the game herd. That’s a fact.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1023315424 Dave Miller

    So we’re killing all but two of the remaining native species in order to protect 0.00…1% of the non-native species… hmm.

    Is there any money in “wolf tourism”?  Seems like that might be a better perspective to take.   I don’t know the cost of 14 calves, but I bet it is minuscule in comparison to what people would pay to have some kind of wild wolf experience.

    Putting a pack of wolves up against flossie the cow is never going to be a fair contest.  If wolves lived there before European settlement, what did they eat?  Can we replace flossie with those?

    • prohuman

      The wolf tourist lie has been exposed in every single State that wolves are in. Hunters and ranchers are the ones that support local rural community the tiny fringe group in the wolf cult don’t have the money to even travel there let alone support the community. As one hotel owner told me I have NEVER rented a room to a wolf lover but I sure do miss all the hunters that use to come here. Why were the hunters no longer coming cause the wolves wipe out the game herd. That’s a fact.

  • PComeleo

    No mention
    of exactly what non-lethal methods Todd Nash was using on his private property
    (surrounded by public land/wolf habitat). Sadly, they were ineffective. Wiping
    out the Imnaha pack by reducing it to the Alpha female and her single pup is
    not the answer. ODFW and Oregon ranchers need to use this as incentive to work
    together to find more effective NON-LETHAL methods to protect their cattle.
    Please read this article for an example of people who have figured out a way to
    protect their cattle while minimizing the need to kill predators reactively:

    http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/wleonard/hey_wildlife_services_killing.html

    • prohuman

      “In the final analysis, wolf recovery has nothing to do with wolves. Instead, ,it is all about the elimination of livestock grazing/ranching and the banning of hunting. Just look at the stated agendas of the groups that sued to keep wolves under federal protection.”"There are two AND ONLY TWO solutions to livestock depredations by wolves. Get rid of the livestock or get rid of the wolves. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors. Ranchers need to understand that ALL non-lethal methods eventually fail and are not a permanent solution.”….Dr. Kay.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      It’s too bad the author of this article didn’t include all the non-lethal things we have tried to do even though he was told. We live w/cougar, bear, coyote very peacefully.  The wolf is a very aggressive predator. 

      • Pecarew

        And we’re not…get a clue !

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

          You need to get a clue.  We live it. 

      • person

        we do not live peacefully with cougars and coyotes. just this summer we lost over $200 due to coyotes. cougars are no better. they kill lots of livestock too.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      There are actually 8 wolves left in the Imnaha pack…14 this spring, 3 left, 2 killed, 2 more to be killed leaving 7 plus 1 pup.

  • PComeleo

    No mention
    of exactly what non-lethal methods Todd Nash was using on his private property
    (surrounded by public land/wolf habitat). Sadly, they were ineffective. Wiping
    out the Imnaha pack by reducing it to the Alpha female and her single pup is
    not the answer. ODFW and Oregon ranchers need to use this as incentive to work
    together to find more effective NON-LETHAL methods to protect their cattle.
    Please read this article for an example of people who have figured out a way to
    protect their cattle while minimizing the need to kill predators reactively:

    http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/wleonard/hey_wildlife_services_killing.html

    • prohuman

      “In the final analysis, wolf recovery has nothing to do with wolves. Instead, ,it is all about the elimination of livestock grazing/ranching and the banning of hunting. Just look at the stated agendas of the groups that sued to keep wolves under federal protection.”"There are two AND ONLY TWO solutions to livestock depredations by wolves. Get rid of the livestock or get rid of the wolves. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors. Ranchers need to understand that ALL non-lethal methods eventually fail and are not a permanent solution.”….Dr. Kay.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      It’s too bad the author of this article didn’t include all the non-lethal things we have tried to do even though he was told. We live w/cougar, bear, coyote very peacefully.  The wolf is a very aggressive predator. 

      • Pecarew

        And we’re not…get a clue !

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

          You need to get a clue.  We live it. 

      • person

        we do not live peacefully with cougars and coyotes. just this summer we lost over $200 due to coyotes. cougars are no better. they kill lots of livestock too.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      There are actually 8 wolves left in the Imnaha pack…14 this spring, 3 left, 2 killed, 2 more to be killed leaving 7 plus 1 pup.

  • Letdown

    Something stinks here…isn’t Nash one of the most anti-wolf guys in the whole state?! What’s the rush to kill a wolf wearing a tracking collar? Why does ODFW inform the public at 6pm on a Friday? Why am I paying for it (AND a check to Nash)?!

    I see the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association called this “good news” on their facebook page. Wow! How out of touch. I was planning a trip to Joseph for just the chance of seeing a wolf. It’s time to stop the killing.

    • prohuman

      Your right it’s time to stop the killing wolves do. The fairy tale  of wolves are needed in the Eco system has been exposed as a fraud.

      • Wolfhunter4Life

        Damn right….lets bust some elk killers! Lets go green! Lets save the environment….shoot some wolves!!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      We haven’t received a dime from you or anyone else.  OR has spent 4.5 million on these wolves already which has nothing to do with us or our cattle.

      • Letdown

        You’re right Angela, you haven’t received A dime from us. You’ve received enough dimes from us that you could swim through them like Scrooge McDuck.  According to the Farm Subsidy Database, your company – Marr Flat Cattle has received $231,775 in the last decade: http://farm.ewg.org/persondetail.php?custnumber=A11575428

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

          If you were as smart as you think you are you would realize what these funds are about, it’s not personal finance. 

    • Anonymous

      Im sure Joseph don’t want you if your one that is pushing this animal.  Your strategy of forcing this animal upon the local people is mind numbing!  I predict the same failure that we see in NM & NV with the Mexican Gray because of people like you!  The $20,000 of known damage by this pack is not enough for you?   If packs can not live in harmony & becomes cronic depredators are you sure you want them despersing to other areas?  The three groups that filed the latest law suit only care about getting that “Donate now” button pressed….’ohh, the poor wolf….we need to save them…their sooo endangered’!  Donate now!   I’m willing to bet your one of the “Donate Now” crowd because true wolf lovers understand the limitations of this animal & understand the reasons for removing cronic depredating wolves from the landscape.    

    • Anonymous

      Im sure Joseph don’t want you if your one that is pushing this animal.  Your strategy of forcing this animal upon the local people is mind numbing!  I predict the same failure that we see in NM & NV with the Mexican Gray because of people like you!  The $20,000 of known damage by this pack is not enough for you?   If packs can not live in harmony & becomes cronic depredators are you sure you want them despersing to other areas?  The three groups that filed the latest law suit only care about getting that “Donate now” button pressed….’ohh, the poor wolf….we need to save them…their sooo endangered’!  Donate now!   I’m willing to bet your one of the “Donate Now” crowd because true wolf lovers understand the limitations of this animal & understand the reasons for removing cronic depredating wolves from the landscape.    

  • Letdown

    Something stinks here…isn’t Nash one of the most anti-wolf guys in the whole state?! What’s the rush to kill a wolf wearing a tracking collar? Why does ODFW inform the public at 6pm on a Friday? Why am I paying for it (AND a check to Nash)?!

    I see the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association called this “good news” on their facebook page. Wow! How out of touch. I was planning a trip to Joseph for just the chance of seeing a wolf. It’s time to stop the killing.

    • prohuman

      Your right it’s time to stop the killing wolves do. The fairy tale  of wolves are needed in the Eco system has been exposed as a fraud.

      • Wolfhunter4Life

        Damn right….lets bust some elk killers! Lets go green! Lets save the environment….shoot some wolves!!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      We haven’t received a dime from you or anyone else.  OR has spent 4.5 million on these wolves already which has nothing to do with us or our cattle.

      • Letdown

        You’re right Angela, you haven’t received A dime from us. You’ve received enough dimes from us that you could swim through them like Scrooge McDuck.  According to the Farm Subsidy Database, your company – Marr Flat Cattle has received $231,775 in the last decade: http://farm.ewg.org/persondetail.php?custnumber=A11575428

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

          If you were as smart as you think you are you would realize what these funds are about, it’s not personal finance. 

    • Anonymous

      Im sure Joseph don’t want you if your one that is pushing this animal.  Your strategy of forcing this animal upon the local people is mind numbing!  I predict the same failure that we see in NM & NV with the Mexican Gray because of people like you!  The $20,000 of known damage by this pack is not enough for you?   If packs can not live in harmony & becomes cronic depredators are you sure you want them despersing to other areas?  The three groups that filed the latest law suit only care about getting that “Donate now” button pressed….’ohh, the poor wolf….we need to save them…their sooo endangered’!  Donate now!   I’m willing to bet your one of the “Donate Now” crowd because true wolf lovers understand the limitations of this animal & understand the reasons for removing cronic depredating wolves from the landscape.    

    • Anonymous

      Im sure Joseph don’t want you if your one that is pushing this animal.  Your strategy of forcing this animal upon the local people is mind numbing!  I predict the same failure that we see in NM & NV with the Mexican Gray because of people like you!  The $20,000 of known damage by this pack is not enough for you?   If packs can not live in harmony & becomes cronic depredators are you sure you want them despersing to other areas?  The three groups that filed the latest law suit only care about getting that “Donate now” button pressed….’ohh, the poor wolf….we need to save them…their sooo endangered’!  Donate now!   I’m willing to bet your one of the “Donate Now” crowd because true wolf lovers understand the limitations of this animal & understand the reasons for removing cronic depredating wolves from the landscape.    

  • https://cathykaech.smugmug.com Photogirl4u

    The Endangered Species Act is a vehicle to control all lands, waterways,
    and those people who use them.  I am very concerned about this tool
    that has originated out of the United Nations will be used against the
    people.  

    The bottom line is this isn’t really about the wolf, rather it’s about getting those who use our natural resources, off of the land.  That would include ranchers, loggers, farmers, hunters, and fishermen.  The wolf,  of which we are dealing with, was introduced not reintroduced. 

    Anyone can request a species be set aside as endangered.    No scientific data is required, but the govt has 90 days to respond.  If they don’t meet the required time frame, the introducing party is then paid because of the status of the tardy EPA specimen.  This is why you see hundreds of species introduced at once, because the NGO (non-government-organization) will be paid one way or another.   We are even doing this in other countries other than our own.  And you, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer, are funding this. 

    Who suffers?  The wolf, man, and the prey that they target.

  • https://cathykaech.smugmug.com Photogirl4u

    The Endangered Species Act is a vehicle to control all lands, waterways,
    and those people who use them.  I am very concerned about this tool
    that has originated out of the United Nations will be used against the
    people.  

    The bottom line is this isn’t really about the wolf, rather it’s about getting those who use our natural resources, off of the land.  That would include ranchers, loggers, farmers, hunters, and fishermen.  The wolf,  of which we are dealing with, was introduced not reintroduced. 

    Anyone can request a species be set aside as endangered.    No scientific data is required, but the govt has 90 days to respond.  If they don’t meet the required time frame, the introducing party is then paid because of the status of the tardy EPA specimen.  This is why you see hundreds of species introduced at once, because the NGO (non-government-organization) will be paid one way or another.   We are even doing this in other countries other than our own.  And you, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer, are funding this. 

    Who suffers?  The wolf, man, and the prey that they target.

  • prohuman

    I hope Oregon is paying attention to this whole corrupt scam of bringing wolves in. Wolves are going to wipe out the game herds scientific fact. Ranchers well be forced out of business. Why so a tiny fringe group of lunatics that worships wolves can sit in their city apartment and say they care about wildlife. Too bad they are so dumbed down they can’t see the truth.

    • William Bjornson

      “Prohuman” might be interpreted to mean being in favor of the long term survival of the human species in an ever more cloudy fish tank, and NOT the short term profit of an environmentally damaging corporate industry, dontcha think?.

      The person below, Photogirl4u, speaks of NGOs making heaps of our tax money by burdening the very industries that do most harm to our long term survival without any clue as to how much MORE of her tax money goes directly and indirectly to the “ranchers, loggers, farmers, hunters, and fishermen” et al (and to the owners, not the ‘workers’) , for nothing but political gain. Letdown, above, gives some numbers just for one ranch… This money would be much better spent on retraining programs for the humans who need employment due to the already hugely destructive effects of overgrazing, overlogging, overfarming, overfishing, …

      And, incidentally, the Endangered Species Act did not originate “out of the United Nations”. It originated from a source possibly even more misunderstood by you, human intellect. We use human intellect to try to project the current situation into the future so we run into as few disasters as possible. Human intellect is what produced an article in Scientic American detailing the exact damage done to New Orleans by Hurricane Katrina SEVERAL YEARS BEFORE Hurricane Katrina*. Lack of human intellect is what produced the disaster itself. We see the same conditions here.

      *www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=drowning-new-orleans

  • prohuman

    I hope Oregon is paying attention to this whole corrupt scam of bringing wolves in. Wolves are going to wipe out the game herds scientific fact. Ranchers well be forced out of business. Why so a tiny fringe group of lunatics that worships wolves can sit in their city apartment and say they care about wildlife. Too bad they are so dumbed down they can’t see the truth.

    • William Bjornson

      “Prohuman” might be interpreted to mean being in favor of the long term survival of the human species in an ever more cloudy fish tank, and NOT the short term profit of an environmentally damaging corporate industry, dontcha think?.

      The person below, Photogirl4u, speaks of NGOs making heaps of our tax money by burdening the very industries that do most harm to our long term survival without any clue as to how much MORE of her tax money goes directly and indirectly to the “ranchers, loggers, farmers, hunters, and fishermen” et al (and to the owners, not the ‘workers’) , for nothing but political gain. Letdown, above, gives some numbers just for one ranch… This money would be much better spent on retraining programs for the humans who need employment due to the already hugely destructive effects of overgrazing, overlogging, overfarming, overfishing, …

      And, incidentally, the Endangered Species Act did not originate “out of the United Nations”. It originated from a source possibly even more misunderstood by you, human intellect. We use human intellect to try to project the current situation into the future so we run into as few disasters as possible. Human intellect is what produced an article in Scientic American detailing the exact damage done to New Orleans by Hurricane Katrina SEVERAL YEARS BEFORE Hurricane Katrina*. Lack of human intellect is what produced the disaster itself. We see the same conditions here.

      *www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=drowning-new-orleans

  • Wolfhunter4Life

    Wolves were reintroduced with 100 being the population set at delisting BY LAW! Two wolves is nothing….more need to die. Hunt hunt hunt some more. Blast some wolves. I’ll be in Idaho for a month aiming to do just that, and I will nail every wolf I can!

    • Pecarew

      I’m more afraid of this guy than any wolf I might happen to run into. It’s guys like you who clearly prove the point, that we are the aggressive predator in this conflict!

    • William Bjornson

      dogbutcher4Life – Ah, Great White Butcher of defenseless animals, tell me you will take a knife and spear only out into the woods as a real human ‘hunter’ would, as a person really interested in preserving the ‘tradition’ of human predation. Go into the woods with anything more and you are no more than the person who works on the slaugtherhouse killing floor. My own impression is that ‘hunters’, as the group is now constituted, simply want to kill anything more masculine than they are, anything even a little alpha stirs up their feelings of inadequacy and must be butchered in a comp-letely unfair and unequal way. This same trait is expressed collectively in our accelerating butchering of helpless and essentially defenseless fellow humans in other countries who happen to have something we want. And your inability to see this in yourselves is completely understandable as only deep shame awaits you if you admit to yourself what you really are. Cowards. Thieves. Self-deceivers. Wolf eaters?

  • Wolfhunter4Life

    Wolves were reintroduced with 100 being the population set at delisting BY LAW! Two wolves is nothing….more need to die. Hunt hunt hunt some more. Blast some wolves. I’ll be in Idaho for a month aiming to do just that, and I will nail every wolf I can!

    • Pecarew

      I’m more afraid of this guy than any wolf I might happen to run into. It’s guys like you who clearly prove the point, that we are the aggressive predator in this conflict!

    • William Bjornson

      dogbutcher4Life – Ah, Great White Butcher of defenseless animals, tell me you will take a knife and spear only out into the woods as a real human ‘hunter’ would, as a person really interested in preserving the ‘tradition’ of human predation. Go into the woods with anything more and you are no more than the person who works on the slaugtherhouse killing floor. My own impression is that ‘hunters’, as the group is now constituted, simply want to kill anything more masculine than they are, anything even a little alpha stirs up their feelings of inadequacy and must be butchered in a comp-letely unfair and unequal way. This same trait is expressed collectively in our accelerating butchering of helpless and essentially defenseless fellow humans in other countries who happen to have something we want. And your inability to see this in yourselves is completely understandable as only deep shame awaits you if you admit to yourself what you really are. Cowards. Thieves. Self-deceivers. Wolf eaters?

  • Anonymous

    The ignorance and undeserved self-righteousness of modern human beings will never cease to amaze and disgust me. For centuries human beings have lived among wild animals, including wolves, without having to persecute, vilify, and torture them. People that shared their hunting grounds and territories with wolves realized that there had to be a compromise; wolves need to kill to eat also. Modern day ranchers should take this into account; they aren’t the only ones on this planet. The pervasiveness of ignorance in a “modern” society such as ours is a joke that we won’t be able to laugh at for long. Read some books, people. Wolves, and all top predators, or animals that we call “keystone species,” are crucial to our ecosystems. The absolute refusal to accept that as fact is rooted in many European-spread misconceptions and outright lies. Wolves have been demonized for as long as people have been coming to North America, and even longer back in the old world. A lot of these falsities can actually be traced back to “the church” (catholic). The wolf was put to use in the position of an avatar of the devil. One would like to think that the dark ages, and their superstitions, have not pervaded the 21st century. But they have. Please, if you are on the fence about this issue, do some research. Think. Don’t buy into the fear driven, meat market promoted, religious zealot opinion.
    P.S. I’m a carnivore, not some hippie vegetarian. Which is actually an aspect that I think should make us more empathetic to the wolves situation…There are non-lethal means of deterring wolves from ones property, by the way. 

    • MT_by_nature

      LOL right.  That’s why wolves in the west were wiped out in the early 1900s.  Those folks didn’t want to live with them.  I was born and raised in Western MT (Lincoln and Ravalli counties) and I know there were wolves here before they felt the need to reintroduce non-essential wolves here.   What ‘people’ are you referring to?  The only people in North America who have been living with wolves in such mass quantities have been hunting them year around for decades now (Alaska and Canada).  I don’t see what the hype is with the wolves.  We kill Coyotes year around and their numbers are still at pestulant levels.  Bears and Mtn. Lions are still not endangered and we hunt them as well.  I don’t much care for beef, so it’s not about the cattle for me.  I have lived in woodlands of MT my whole life, and yeah, seen my fair share of wolves.  NOW, they are coming into my back yard (literally) and killing my dogs out of my FENCED YARD.  That could have been my children!!  I’m not for the massacre of wolves, but I strongly believe their numbers need to be managed.  I come from a long line of hunters and trappers and to go out into the wilderness hunting and get surrounded by a pack of 14 wolves is a little intimidating.  Especially when all you have is a bow and a couple of arrows.  It has happened to me twice now while hunting and once while hiking.  They weren’t curious of me or even affraid of me.  They were treating me no different then they did my dogs when they killed them. 
      Yeah, wolves may be ‘crucial’ to the ecosystem, but they were already here, now we have too many.  Too many of any species isn’t eco friendly.  According to ecologists I have spoken with, if we want the ecosystem that existed before europeans came to the US, then we need to reintroduce Native American Indians.  they managed animal populations even before ‘white’ man got here.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      The wolf is not crucial to this ecosystem.  When they are going on private property and slautering…We live with the land everyday.  Most people just fantasize about it and don’t know the reality.  The wolf is an apex predator, no other predator than man.  You may have him on your property if you like.  The elk calf count is down 18/100 also in wolf country.

      • pecarew

        Explain to me why we’re still setting up these elk reserves and feeding them to keep them from starving through the winters. Elk have been over populated for years and the wolves could help balance their numbers. Nature was taking care of these imbalances long before we arrived. I’m sorry, but we now live on their land,  just as we took it from the American Indians, we owe it to both, let nature have a say!

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

          Not feeding elk in Wallowa County.  We have no need for the wolf here.  I will say the elk calf count is down 18/100 in wolf country.  FYI these predations/slaughters are taking place on private property.

    • september

      This post is intelligent and reasonable. If only the ranchers in NE Oregon were able to look past their own needs and realize that the environment is not theirs alone. I once respected ranchers, now I realize how fearful and selfish they (at least the Nash’s and other outspoken ones) are. Quite simply, the world does not revolve around them. The native predators are instrumental in restoring a natural environment, read the research as Falcon42 says. And quit repeating yourself Angie Nash, you write the same simplistic and erroneous stuff in every blog you can. Don’t you have cattle to protect out there!

  • Anonymous

    The ignorance and undeserved self-righteousness of modern human beings will never cease to amaze and disgust me. For centuries human beings have lived among wild animals, including wolves, without having to persecute, vilify, and torture them. People that shared their hunting grounds and territories with wolves realized that there had to be a compromise; wolves need to kill to eat also. Modern day ranchers should take this into account; they aren’t the only ones on this planet. The pervasiveness of ignorance in a “modern” society such as ours is a joke that we won’t be able to laugh at for long. Read some books, people. Wolves, and all top predators, or animals that we call “keystone species,” are crucial to our ecosystems. The absolute refusal to accept that as fact is rooted in many European-spread misconceptions and outright lies. Wolves have been demonized for as long as people have been coming to North America, and even longer back in the old world. A lot of these falsities can actually be traced back to “the church” (catholic). The wolf was put to use in the position of an avatar of the devil. One would like to think that the dark ages, and their superstitions, have not pervaded the 21st century. But they have. Please, if you are on the fence about this issue, do some research. Think. Don’t buy into the fear driven, meat market promoted, religious zealot opinion.
    P.S. I’m a carnivore, not some hippie vegetarian. Which is actually an aspect that I think should make us more empathetic to the wolves situation…There are non-lethal means of deterring wolves from ones property, by the way. 

    • MT_by_nature

      LOL right.  That’s why wolves in the west were wiped out in the early 1900s.  Those folks didn’t want to live with them.  I was born and raised in Western MT (Lincoln and Ravalli counties) and I know there were wolves here before they felt the need to reintroduce non-essential wolves here.   What ‘people’ are you referring to?  The only people in North America who have been living with wolves in such mass quantities have been hunting them year around for decades now (Alaska and Canada).  I don’t see what the hype is with the wolves.  We kill Coyotes year around and their numbers are still at pestulant levels.  Bears and Mtn. Lions are still not endangered and we hunt them as well.  I don’t much care for beef, so it’s not about the cattle for me.  I have lived in woodlands of MT my whole life, and yeah, seen my fair share of wolves.  NOW, they are coming into my back yard (literally) and killing my dogs out of my FENCED YARD.  That could have been my children!!  I’m not for the massacre of wolves, but I strongly believe their numbers need to be managed.  I come from a long line of hunters and trappers and to go out into the wilderness hunting and get surrounded by a pack of 14 wolves is a little intimidating.  Especially when all you have is a bow and a couple of arrows.  It has happened to me twice now while hunting and once while hiking.  They weren’t curious of me or even affraid of me.  They were treating me no different then they did my dogs when they killed them. 
      Yeah, wolves may be ‘crucial’ to the ecosystem, but they were already here, now we have too many.  Too many of any species isn’t eco friendly.  According to ecologists I have spoken with, if we want the ecosystem that existed before europeans came to the US, then we need to reintroduce Native American Indians.  they managed animal populations even before ‘white’ man got here.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      The wolf is not crucial to this ecosystem.  When they are going on private property and slautering…We live with the land everyday.  Most people just fantasize about it and don’t know the reality.  The wolf is an apex predator, no other predator than man.  You may have him on your property if you like.  The elk calf count is down 18/100 also in wolf country.

      • pecarew

        Explain to me why we’re still setting up these elk reserves and feeding them to keep them from starving through the winters. Elk have been over populated for years and the wolves could help balance their numbers. Nature was taking care of these imbalances long before we arrived. I’m sorry, but we now live on their land,  just as we took it from the American Indians, we owe it to both, let nature have a say!

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

          Not feeding elk in Wallowa County.  We have no need for the wolf here.  I will say the elk calf count is down 18/100 in wolf country.  FYI these predations/slaughters are taking place on private property.

    • september

      This post is intelligent and reasonable. If only the ranchers in NE Oregon were able to look past their own needs and realize that the environment is not theirs alone. I once respected ranchers, now I realize how fearful and selfish they (at least the Nash’s and other outspoken ones) are. Quite simply, the world does not revolve around them. The native predators are instrumental in restoring a natural environment, read the research as Falcon42 says. And quit repeating yourself Angie Nash, you write the same simplistic and erroneous stuff in every blog you can. Don’t you have cattle to protect out there!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

    Oregonians have spent 4.5 million dollars on the Imnaha pack alone which had nothing to do with our cattle.  We have personally lost $40,000 due to wolf predation.  RK needs to get his facts straight and keep his prejudice out.  Also no one has a way of really saying how many wolves are left in this pack as none of the others are collared.  I don’t think 3 wolves could do this much damage in 12 hours. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      BTW Predation on PRIVATE PROPERTY!

    • Anonymous

      Thanks for chiming in, Angela. It seems like one of the trickier parts of managing wolves in Oregon has been counting them. ODFW only counts “confirmed” wolves. I’ve always wondered how close their counts are to the actual number. I’d also be interested to know whether you will be reimbursed for the $40,000 you lost to wolf predation.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

        No we will not be reimbursed.  There were 13 wolves in the Imnaha pack now only 4 when only 3 have moved on and 2 were killed.  Doesn’t add up does it. With no collars ODFW can’t be sure how many there are.  What I will say is that it looked like there were more than 3 wolves in on the last kill.

        • Refugee2000

          $40,000 in losses sounds like a lot of dead cows. How many cows are you claiming were killed by wolves? How many of those were confirmed by ODFW? If the state reimburses for confirmed wolf kills, why won’t you be reimbursed?  At least the last one was confirmed when a state reimbursement plan was in place. Are you being reimbursed by Defenders of Wildlife for any earlier confirmed kills?

          Earlier you mentioned “ all the non-lethal things we have tried to do.”

          Can you describe what they were, when you started using them, how extensive they were, etc.?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            We have lost at least 36 calves to wolves.  We run on 100,000 acres. When wolves kill there is nothing left except maybe a leg or head or ribcage. Very difficult to find. We have been paid for 1 confirmed kill in 09 when in 09 we lost 20.  We now have GPS on cattle to track contact w/wolves, changes in grazing patterns etc.  The cattle have to be confirmed to be reimbursed which has been a problem even with wolf prints, scat, and trauma consistent w/wolf kills.  Hopefully that will change. We have run cattle on this range for many, many years without this kind of predation.  We will have a count on calves in about a month for this year. It’s normal to lose 3-4 but not 20. 

            Non Lethal methods includes Range Rider, extensively more human presence, keeping cattle closer together, removing any dead animals.  The day before/of the last predation our rider was out in this same pasture along w/some hunters.  We also have neighbors looking out for us and us for them.  These wolves have no real fear of people as they simply come to town and kill also.  The wolves have also just run cattle to death and not eaten them.  Our neighbor lost a bull, cow and calf which cases are being reviewed this week.  We spend alot of time checking and rechecking our cattle.  The elk calf count is down also to 18/100 in this same area. Wolves basically hunt, eat, repeat.

          • september

            FYI: This information submitted by Angela Nash has been disproved previously. Do not believe it.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            Info from ODFW official. 

          • Refugee2000

            Angela, I’m wondering how many cows you are running on summer range and how close together you keep them.  Doesn’t the rider know the location of  the alpha male wolf, the one alleged to be involved in the last killing, from the collar derived GPS data sent out regularly?  Does the rider stay with the herd at night, like a sheepherder stays with their sheep?

            Also, are the other ranchers in the Imnaha pack territory losing a lot of these large summer range calves? 

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            We run close to 600 head of cattle.  About 400 are in wolf country as wolf territory has spread out. The range rider knows the general location of the “pack” (alpha male & female) which divided into 2 packs this spring.  There were 13, a pack of 6 and a pack of 7.  The alpha male is the only one w/collar on now I think so we get a general location of him. We get a text from ODFW everyday telling us/Range Rider where the wolves are.  They can travel easily 50 miles in a day.  They have lost touch with the pack of 7, 3 wolves have moved on and 2 have been killed leaving 8 plus a pup.  The range rider sometimes camps out.  We have much more human presence and the cattle are kept closer together to be able to check them more often.  This is 100,000 acres, 10,000 private which is where much of the killing takes place.  Wolves seem to kill early am or at night.  

            Our neighbor lost a bull, mama cow and calf which cases are being reviewed.  When wolves kill alot of times all that’s left is a head, ribcage or leg so it’s very difficult to find remains.  We watch the birds alot to see what they are paying attention to as well.  We will bring our calves in soon and have an actual count of how many are “missing”.

            In the spring when the wolves “come to town” alot more efforts in small pastures are made, noise, rubber bullets, flagery (fencing) around calving pastures.  The wolves are also much more visible during this time.

          • Refugee2000

            How many cows on the private spread? 150- to 200? You tell us that “The range rider sometimes camps out. ” How often does he/she do that? Was the rider staying with them, camping out there, at the time the calf was killed?  Was there any other “human presence” with the cows on private land at the time of the depredation?  Do you get just one text a day from ODFW each day about the location of the alpha, or are there more? One would assume that the GPS coordinates indicated the alpha was in the area. If not, then it would seem that more riders are needed to protect the cows, no?

            I asked “how close together you keep them?” Were the cows on the private 10,00 acres or so grouped “close together” so you could monitor them, or were they spread out over the property?

            Also, I had asked you, in the last post, whether ”the other ranchers in the Imnaha pack territory [are] losing a lot of these large summer range calves” to wolves? Will you please answer that question?

            Thanks!

          • Refugee2000

            Oh Angela, please share your experience and answer the questions.

            Were the questions I previously asked about things you felt to uncomfortable about to answer?  They beg for your answers.

            Like whether ”the other ranchers in the Imnaha pack territory [are] losing a lot of these large summer range calves” to wolves?

            And “Do you get just one text a day from ODFW each day about the location of the alpha, or are there more?”

            And “how close together you keep them?” “Were the cows on the private 10,00 acres or so grouped “close together” so you could monitor them, or were they spread out over the property?”

            I understand that there are some 7,ooo head of cattle, owned by several different permittees, in the Imnaha pack territory, so it would be useful to know how many cattle the other permittees are losing. That way we could know more about their loss  numbers and ask questions about why certain permittees are losing more than others, if that is the case. 

            The Oregon Wolf Plan states on p. 47 that:

            “Phase I (0-4 breeding pairs) 

            Non-injurious harassment of wolves is allowed without a permit by livestock producers or their designated agents on their own land or by permittees who are legally using public land under valid livestock grazing allotments. Such actions can include scaring off an animal(s) by firing shots into the air, making loud noises or otherwise confronting the animal(s) without doing bodily harm. Non-injurious harassment is allowed only for wolves in the act of harassing, attempting to harass or in close proximity to livestock.”

             Did you or your husband go out on “your” private land to use these methods when you knew that the Alpha was in the neighborhood, or were you too tired after coming home from your day job?

            How can one range rider hired to take care of some 7,000 head of cattle spread out over many thousands  (hundreds of thousands?) of acres, including yours and other allotments around the Salt Creek Divide, possibly be able to cover the territory?  Aren’t many more needed? Where was Todd? What’s he doing?

            Are the cows yours, or are they owned by the Marr Flat Cattle Co. L.L.C.?  Principals include Chris Buhler (absentee from Clifornia?), Allison Reed, Lake Oswego, Oregon, with both Leslie Miller of Los Angeles, CA and Todd Nash of 64541 Alder Slope Road in Enterprise, OR listed as managers. Does the Buhler family actually own most or all of the outfit with Todd hired as one of the managers?

            You stated that “These wolves have no real fear of people as they simply come to town and kill also.” I can find no documentation of that, and I have heard from Joseph, OR that the statement is simply not true.  Will you please document your statement with some verifiable source?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            Your fiddle is really out of tune…Playing dumb is also very unattractive.

          • Refugee2000

            What is truly unattractive Angela are your ad hominem attacks, your lack of candor, and your conflicting statements concerning your claims about wolves, compensation, land and cattle ownership, and efforts at non lethal control. People drew their own conclusions as to why you refuse to answer relevant questions concerning your statements. If all ranchers, as well as  hired hands like Todd, had made an honest effort to use effective non lethal control, your servants at ODFW and “Wildlife Services” would not have issued the recent kill order for the two wolves. Hopefully the state ordered stay of execution in response to the recent request by wolf advocates for judicial review will become permanent.

          • Angela Nash

            A sour note Christopher Christie? 

          • Angela Nash

            A sour note Christopher Christie? 

          • Anonymous

            Wow Refugee2000  ,   $20,000 of known damage by this pack is not enough for you? 

            How many tax dollar are spent tracking this cronic depredating pack?

            Do you think that this pack will send out pack taught cronic depredators?  

            Is that going to be good for the wolf program in Oregon? 

            Does Oregon have true wolf habitat where they don’t cause trouble?   

            According to you is there ever a time to remove wolves from the landscape?  

            Isn’t the Oregon Wolf Plan clear that it allows the removeal of cronic depredating wolves even in your 1 – 4 pack grouping?  

          • Anonymous

            Wow Refugee2000  ,   $20,000 of known damage by this pack is not enough for you? 

            How many tax dollar are spent tracking this cronic depredating pack?

            Do you think that this pack will send out pack taught cronic depredators?  

            Is that going to be good for the wolf program in Oregon? 

            Does Oregon have true wolf habitat where they don’t cause trouble?   

            According to you is there ever a time to remove wolves from the landscape?  

            Isn’t the Oregon Wolf Plan clear that it allows the removeal of cronic depredating wolves even in your 1 – 4 pack grouping?  

        • Pecarew

          Boy, I’ll bet this sounds a lot like the same hysteria that brought about the extermination of the wolf back in the 19th century! 

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            Just the facts, no hysteria…It’s not funny.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

    Oregonians have spent 4.5 million dollars on the Imnaha pack alone which had nothing to do with our cattle.  We have personally lost $40,000 due to wolf predation.  RK needs to get his facts straight and keep his prejudice out.  Also no one has a way of really saying how many wolves are left in this pack as none of the others are collared.  I don’t think 3 wolves could do this much damage in 12 hours. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      BTW Predation on PRIVATE PROPERTY!

    • Anonymous

      Thanks for chiming in, Angela. It seems like one of the trickier parts of managing wolves in Oregon has been counting them. ODFW only counts “confirmed” wolves. I’ve always wondered how close their counts are to the actual number. I’d also be interested to know whether you will be reimbursed for the $40,000 you lost to wolf predation.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

        No we will not be reimbursed.  There were 13 wolves in the Imnaha pack now only 4 when only 3 have moved on and 2 were killed.  Doesn’t add up does it. With no collars ODFW can’t be sure how many there are.  What I will say is that it looked like there were more than 3 wolves in on the last kill.

        • Refugee2000

          $40,000 in losses sounds like a lot of dead cows. How many cows are you claiming were killed by wolves? How many of those were confirmed by ODFW? If the state reimburses for confirmed wolf kills, why won’t you be reimbursed?  At least the last one was confirmed when a state reimbursement plan was in place. Are you being reimbursed by Defenders of Wildlife for any earlier confirmed kills?

          Earlier you mentioned “ all the non-lethal things we have tried to do.”

          Can you describe what they were, when you started using them, how extensive they were, etc.?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            We have lost at least 36 calves to wolves.  We run on 100,000 acres. When wolves kill there is nothing left except maybe a leg or head or ribcage. Very difficult to find. We have been paid for 1 confirmed kill in 09 when in 09 we lost 20.  We now have GPS on cattle to track contact w/wolves, changes in grazing patterns etc.  The cattle have to be confirmed to be reimbursed which has been a problem even with wolf prints, scat, and trauma consistent w/wolf kills.  Hopefully that will change. We have run cattle on this range for many, many years without this kind of predation.  We will have a count on calves in about a month for this year. It’s normal to lose 3-4 but not 20. 

            Non Lethal methods includes Range Rider, extensively more human presence, keeping cattle closer together, removing any dead animals.  The day before/of the last predation our rider was out in this same pasture along w/some hunters.  We also have neighbors looking out for us and us for them.  These wolves have no real fear of people as they simply come to town and kill also.  The wolves have also just run cattle to death and not eaten them.  Our neighbor lost a bull, cow and calf which cases are being reviewed this week.  We spend alot of time checking and rechecking our cattle.  The elk calf count is down also to 18/100 in this same area. Wolves basically hunt, eat, repeat.

          • september

            FYI: This information submitted by Angela Nash has been disproved previously. Do not believe it.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            Info from ODFW official. 

          • Refugee2000

            Angela, I’m wondering how many cows you are running on summer range and how close together you keep them.  Doesn’t the rider know the location of  the alpha male wolf, the one alleged to be involved in the last killing, from the collar derived GPS data sent out regularly?  Does the rider stay with the herd at night, like a sheepherder stays with their sheep?

            Also, are the other ranchers in the Imnaha pack territory losing a lot of these large summer range calves? 

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            We run close to 600 head of cattle.  About 400 are in wolf country as wolf territory has spread out. The range rider knows the general location of the “pack” (alpha male & female) which divided into 2 packs this spring.  There were 13, a pack of 6 and a pack of 7.  The alpha male is the only one w/collar on now I think so we get a general location of him. We get a text from ODFW everyday telling us/Range Rider where the wolves are.  They can travel easily 50 miles in a day.  They have lost touch with the pack of 7, 3 wolves have moved on and 2 have been killed leaving 8 plus a pup.  The range rider sometimes camps out.  We have much more human presence and the cattle are kept closer together to be able to check them more often.  This is 100,000 acres, 10,000 private which is where much of the killing takes place.  Wolves seem to kill early am or at night.  

            Our neighbor lost a bull, mama cow and calf which cases are being reviewed.  When wolves kill alot of times all that’s left is a head, ribcage or leg so it’s very difficult to find remains.  We watch the birds alot to see what they are paying attention to as well.  We will bring our calves in soon and have an actual count of how many are “missing”.

            In the spring when the wolves “come to town” alot more efforts in small pastures are made, noise, rubber bullets, flagery (fencing) around calving pastures.  The wolves are also much more visible during this time.

          • Refugee2000

            How many cows on the private spread? 150- to 200? You tell us that “The range rider sometimes camps out. ” How often does he/she do that? Was the rider staying with them, camping out there, at the time the calf was killed?  Was there any other “human presence” with the cows on private land at the time of the depredation?  Do you get just one text a day from ODFW each day about the location of the alpha, or are there more? One would assume that the GPS coordinates indicated the alpha was in the area. If not, then it would seem that more riders are needed to protect the cows, no?

            I asked “how close together you keep them?” Were the cows on the private 10,00 acres or so grouped “close together” so you could monitor them, or were they spread out over the property?

            Also, I had asked you, in the last post, whether ”the other ranchers in the Imnaha pack territory [are] losing a lot of these large summer range calves” to wolves? Will you please answer that question?

            Thanks!

          • Refugee2000

            Oh Angela, please share your experience and answer the questions.

            Were the questions I previously asked about things you felt to uncomfortable about to answer?  They beg for your answers.

            Like whether ”the other ranchers in the Imnaha pack territory [are] losing a lot of these large summer range calves” to wolves?

            And “Do you get just one text a day from ODFW each day about the location of the alpha, or are there more?”

            And “how close together you keep them?” “Were the cows on the private 10,00 acres or so grouped “close together” so you could monitor them, or were they spread out over the property?”

            I understand that there are some 7,ooo head of cattle, owned by several different permittees, in the Imnaha pack territory, so it would be useful to know how many cattle the other permittees are losing. That way we could know more about their loss  numbers and ask questions about why certain permittees are losing more than others, if that is the case. 

            The Oregon Wolf Plan states on p. 47 that:

            “Phase I (0-4 breeding pairs) 

            Non-injurious harassment of wolves is allowed without a permit by livestock producers or their designated agents on their own land or by permittees who are legally using public land under valid livestock grazing allotments. Such actions can include scaring off an animal(s) by firing shots into the air, making loud noises or otherwise confronting the animal(s) without doing bodily harm. Non-injurious harassment is allowed only for wolves in the act of harassing, attempting to harass or in close proximity to livestock.”

             Did you or your husband go out on “your” private land to use these methods when you knew that the Alpha was in the neighborhood, or were you too tired after coming home from your day job?

            How can one range rider hired to take care of some 7,000 head of cattle spread out over many thousands  (hundreds of thousands?) of acres, including yours and other allotments around the Salt Creek Divide, possibly be able to cover the territory?  Aren’t many more needed? Where was Todd? What’s he doing?

            Are the cows yours, or are they owned by the Marr Flat Cattle Co. L.L.C.?  Principals include Chris Buhler (absentee from Clifornia?), Allison Reed, Lake Oswego, Oregon, with both Leslie Miller of Los Angeles, CA and Todd Nash of 64541 Alder Slope Road in Enterprise, OR listed as managers. Does the Buhler family actually own most or all of the outfit with Todd hired as one of the managers?

            You stated that “These wolves have no real fear of people as they simply come to town and kill also.” I can find no documentation of that, and I have heard from Joseph, OR that the statement is simply not true.  Will you please document your statement with some verifiable source?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            Your fiddle is really out of tune…Playing dumb is also very unattractive.

          • Refugee2000

            What is truly unattractive Angela are your ad hominem attacks, your lack of candor, and your conflicting statements concerning your claims about wolves, compensation, land and cattle ownership, and efforts at non lethal control. People drew their own conclusions as to why you refuse to answer relevant questions concerning your statements. If all ranchers, as well as  hired hands like Todd, had made an honest effort to use effective non lethal control, your servants at ODFW and “Wildlife Services” would not have issued the recent kill order for the two wolves. Hopefully the state ordered stay of execution in response to the recent request by wolf advocates for judicial review will become permanent.

          • Angela Nash

            A sour note Christopher Christie? 

          • Angela Nash

            A sour note Christopher Christie? 

          • Anonymous

            Wow Refugee2000  ,   $20,000 of known damage by this pack is not enough for you? 

            How many tax dollar are spent tracking this cronic depredating pack?

            Do you think that this pack will send out pack taught cronic depredators?  

            Is that going to be good for the wolf program in Oregon? 

            Does Oregon have true wolf habitat where they don’t cause trouble?   

            According to you is there ever a time to remove wolves from the landscape?  

            Isn’t the Oregon Wolf Plan clear that it allows the removeal of cronic depredating wolves even in your 1 – 4 pack grouping?  

          • Anonymous

            Wow Refugee2000  ,   $20,000 of known damage by this pack is not enough for you? 

            How many tax dollar are spent tracking this cronic depredating pack?

            Do you think that this pack will send out pack taught cronic depredators?  

            Is that going to be good for the wolf program in Oregon? 

            Does Oregon have true wolf habitat where they don’t cause trouble?   

            According to you is there ever a time to remove wolves from the landscape?  

            Isn’t the Oregon Wolf Plan clear that it allows the removeal of cronic depredating wolves even in your 1 – 4 pack grouping?  

        • Pecarew

          Boy, I’ll bet this sounds a lot like the same hysteria that brought about the extermination of the wolf back in the 19th century! 

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

            Just the facts, no hysteria…It’s not funny.

  • Anonymous

    As you may know, ”pigs’ are congenitally terrified of wolves. Wolves like bacon too. But they don’t like ‘long pig’ as the mighty bow hunter writing here, twice immersed in a pack yet ungnawed, demonstrates. Nor has there been a recorded attack of North American wolf upon human in history. As to killing someone’s dogs, those dogs were probably mouthing off just a little too much. You know how that feels, dontcha? When some twerpy little half-breed just won’t shut up and wants to fight. We used to have our own treaties with them, these models of Viking behavior, when we were preColon native Americans. And we kept herds then, too. But the greedy Albinoids want EVERYTHING. ALL the land. ALL the food. And only wolves that understand ‘private property’. What is it about the ‘country’ that produces Albinoid human beings with the same operant values as the other animals around them, coupled with a compulsive murderousness and complete lack of insight and empathy? Or, are they just normal humans? History suggests, shouts, this is the case, really. But I cling to all of the childhood propaganda of ‘intelligence’, ‘wisdom’, even ‘nobility’ whatever that is, and I refuse to accept these people into my species, which then sets up huge internal conflicts in my worldview, makes my worldview feel like some kind of religion… and even with compensation from the rest of us, they cannot share with these Native Oregonians whom they have so thoroughly displaced. Is wolf-attack the only way that calves can die in the wild? And would not a hungry wolf, even hungry human, take advantage of such a find? But to have taken so much from these wild competitors and to have gained so much from our association with them and their gene pool that we couldn’t spare the odd calf is pure hatred of Life. Hopeless. Irrational. Pathetic. And characteristically human? Alas, look only to New York for your answer to that.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      Alas, how many joints did you smoke before arriving at this philosophical cow sh_t?

      • Anonymous

        I thought if I spread this over the barren fields of kneejerkiness I see here, an independent thought or two might spring, unprecedented, from the clay. People who gain so much from using a hundred times the space and resources that they deserve to produce a product that contributes (according to R. Reagan) significant pollution and resource degradation to the human bootprint upon our life support system and who are NOT ‘primary’ producers but producers of what is for most of the world a luxury product, should have some sense of their own destructiveness. Not only do you not have any sense of the harm you create, but you whine and complain when any sort of rebalancing is attempted. Meat is a fine thing, I lke it. But its massive production is a heavy load on the environment from start to finish.

        But, if you are an honest person, answer my question: Is wolf-attack the only way that calves can die in the wild?

        If your herd is free range, you must lose at least 10% of your calves to natural attrition without any wolves at all. After a family of wolves gets done with an already dead carcass, how exactly do you determine the calf died of wolf predation? Please explain this to me that I might gain sympathy for your tragic situation there. Or understand even better the dishonesty in your attempts to avoid finding solutions other than extermination for an ‘inconvenience’ with greater overall value than your own.

        • Refugee2000

          Keep writing William, you have a brilliant, valuable and unique perspective.

  • Anonymous

    As you may know, ”pigs’ are congenitally terrified of wolves. Wolves like bacon too. But they don’t like ‘long pig’ as the mighty bow hunter writing here, twice immersed in a pack yet ungnawed, demonstrates. Nor has there been a recorded attack of North American wolf upon human in history. As to killing someone’s dogs, those dogs were probably mouthing off just a little too much. You know how that feels, dontcha? When some twerpy little half-breed just won’t shut up and wants to fight. We used to have our own treaties with them, these models of Viking behavior, when we were preColon native Americans. And we kept herds then, too. But the greedy Albinoids want EVERYTHING. ALL the land. ALL the food. And only wolves that understand ‘private property’. What is it about the ‘country’ that produces Albinoid human beings with the same operant values as the other animals around them, coupled with a compulsive murderousness and complete lack of insight and empathy? Or, are they just normal humans? History suggests, shouts, this is the case, really. But I cling to all of the childhood propaganda of ‘intelligence’, ‘wisdom’, even ‘nobility’ whatever that is, and I refuse to accept these people into my species, which then sets up huge internal conflicts in my worldview, makes my worldview feel like some kind of religion… and even with compensation from the rest of us, they cannot share with these Native Oregonians whom they have so thoroughly displaced. Is wolf-attack the only way that calves can die in the wild? And would not a hungry wolf, even hungry human, take advantage of such a find? But to have taken so much from these wild competitors and to have gained so much from our association with them and their gene pool that we couldn’t spare the odd calf is pure hatred of Life. Hopeless. Irrational. Pathetic. And characteristically human? Alas, look only to New York for your answer to that.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Angela-Nash/1199450057 Angela Nash

      Alas, how many joints did you smoke before arriving at this philosophical cow sh_t?

      • Anonymous

        I thought if I spread this over the barren fields of kneejerkiness I see here, an independent thought or two might spring, unprecedented, from the clay. People who gain so much from using a hundred times the space and resources that they deserve to produce a product that contributes (according to R. Reagan) significant pollution and resource degradation to the human bootprint upon our life support system and who are NOT ‘primary’ producers but producers of what is for most of the world a luxury product, should have some sense of their own destructiveness. Not only do you not have any sense of the harm you create, but you whine and complain when any sort of rebalancing is attempted. Meat is a fine thing, I lke it. But its massive production is a heavy load on the environment from start to finish.

        But, if you are an honest person, answer my question: Is wolf-attack the only way that calves can die in the wild?

        If your herd is free range, you must lose at least 10% of your calves to natural attrition without any wolves at all. After a family of wolves gets done with an already dead carcass, how exactly do you determine the calf died of wolf predation? Please explain this to me that I might gain sympathy for your tragic situation there. Or understand even better the dishonesty in your attempts to avoid finding solutions other than extermination for an ‘inconvenience’ with greater overall value than your own.

        • Refugee2000

          Keep writing William, you have a brilliant, valuable and unique perspective.

  • Mario

    TOTAL BULLSHIT I HOPE THOSE RANCHERS LOSE EVERY ONE OF THEIR LAND ENCROACHING WATER POISONING MEAT SACKS TO THE WOLVES AND ALL OTHER PREDATORS !!!  ” BOYCOTT :OREGON,MONTANA,COLORODO,AND IDAHO” …..

  • Mario

    TOTAL BULLSHIT I HOPE THOSE RANCHERS LOSE EVERY ONE OF THEIR LAND ENCROACHING WATER POISONING MEAT SACKS TO THE WOLVES AND ALL OTHER PREDATORS !!!  ” BOYCOTT :OREGON,MONTANA,COLORODO,AND IDAHO” …..

  • Anonymous

    Hi all. I’ve been pretty impressed with most of this discussion. You’re really digging into the heart of the conflict here. But I am going to remove the posts with swear words in them and encourage you all to be civil to one another. I am reading your comments with interest, and I’ll be  working them into future coverage of wolves in the Northwest.

  • Anonymous

    Hi all. I’ve been pretty impressed with most of this discussion. You’re really digging into the heart of the conflict here. But I am going to remove the posts with swear words in them and encourage you all to be civil to one another. I am reading your comments with interest, and I’ll be  working them into future coverage of wolves in the Northwest.

  • Wolf Lover~! <3

    Don’t kill the wolves! They were probably just hungry! The poor things might not have been able to get any food recently… Don’t kill the wolves for stupid reasons! It’s in their nature to kill animals for food, they can’t help it! And if you’re going to be compensated, it shouldn’t even matter! Grrr… if i was old enough, i’d see if i could take them in. Dang my young-ness. it’s such a pain sometimes… >:(

  • Wolf Lover~! <3

    Don’t kill the wolves! They were probably just hungry! The poor things might not have been able to get any food recently… Don’t kill the wolves for stupid reasons! It’s in their nature to kill animals for food, they can’t help it! And if you’re going to be compensated, it shouldn’t even matter! Grrr… if i was old enough, i’d see if i could take them in. Dang my young-ness. it’s such a pain sometimes… >:(